Facilitators and barriers to behavior change in overweight and obesity management using the COM-B model.

Introduction: Increasing overweight and obesity rates represent one of the global public health challenges. COM-B is a theoretical model used to identify areas to target to achieve behavior change. It identifies three factors that are needed for any behavior to occur: capability, opportunity, and motivation. We aimed to assess the potential facilitators and barriers to behavior change in weight management using the COM-B. Methods: The study included 139 people with overweight and obesity (mean age 48.81 ± 14.49 years; 64.5% female; body mass index 32.64 ± 6.51 kg/m2; waist-to-height ratio 0.62 ± 0.10) from primary care settings. All participants completed the Brief Measure of Behavior Change (COM-B), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSE), and the Overall Evaluation of Health (OEH). Multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the data. Results: The associations between sociodemographic and clinical variables and COM-B domains attenuated or were no longer significant when psychological resources were added to the regression models. Self-efficacy was identified as a stronger facilitator of health behavior change (p < 0.001) when compared to self-esteem (p < 0.05). No associations between automatic motivation and psychological resources were identified, however. Automatic motivation was found to be associated with higher age, being in a relationship, and better health. Discussion: Behavioral interventions for weight management should specifically target different components of COM-B. Self-efficacy and self-esteem may play a significant role in individual capabilities, opportunities, and reflective motivation and should be included in tailored public health interventions. Health programs targeting younger and single people, and people with chronic conditions may help to promote sustainable behavior change.

Clinical Utility of the Logarithmically Transformed Ratio of Triglycerides-to- High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Its Relationship with Other Atherosclerosis-Related Lipid Factors in Type 2 Diabetes.

Background: Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels and reduced high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) levels indicate lipid abnormalities, but their levels alone do not reflect the actual status of plasma atherogenicity and cardiovascular disease risk (CVD). TG and HDL-c levels directly affect the balance between plasma atherogenic and antiatherogenic factors, as well as values of the atherogenic index of plasma [AIP (logarithmically transformed ratio of TG-to-HDL-c)]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AIP risk categories (an indicator of plasma atherogenicity) and the relationships of AIP with other atherosclerosis-related lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their potential clinical utility. Methods: Standard lipid profile, AIP, and lipid hydroperoxides (LOOH) were investigated in 124 T2DM outpatients (mean age 52.7 ± 5.9 years) and 61 healthy subjects (mean age 50.9 ± 6.8 years). T2DM patients were subclassified according to the AIP risk category and glycemic control. Results: Higher levels of AIP, LOOH, and TG and lower HDL-c (all P < 0.0001) were observed in T2DM patients than in the control group. AIP positively correlated with LOOH, non-HDL-c, and the non-HDL/HDL ratio (all P < 0.0001). The TG level was strongly correlated with the LOOH level among T2DM patients (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The close association of AIP with other atherosclerosis-related lipid factors reveals an increased plasma atherogenicity. AIP risk categories indicate the actual status of plasma atherogenicity and identify subjects who are at an increased atherogenic risk and the development of CVD. In this respect, AIP has a promising future in routine clinical practice.

Patient-Associated Characteristics Influencing the Risk for Non-Persistence with Statins in Older Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Secondary prevention of peripheral arterial disease includes administration of statins regardless of the patient's serum cholesterol level. Our study aimed to identify patient-associated risk factors for statin non-persistence and comparison of the explanatory power of models based on clusters of patient-associated characteristics. METHODS: Our study cohort (n = 8330) was assembled from the database of the largest health insurance provider in the Slovak Republic. Statin users aged ≥ 65 years in whom peripheral arterial disease was diagnosed during 2012 were included. Patients were followed for 5 years; those with a treatment gap period of at least 6 months without statin prescription were classified as "non-persistent". The risk factors for non-persistence were identified within six models (sociodemographic, cardiovascular events, comorbid conditions, statin-related characteristics, cardiovascular co-medication and full model) using Cox regression. The explanatory power of models was assessed using Harrell's C-index. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, 35.7% of patients were found to be non-persistent. The full model had the highest explanatory power (C = 0.632). Female sex, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin as initially administered statins, being a new statin user and an increasing co-payment were associated with an increased risk for non-persistence. Increasing age, history of ischaemic stroke, diabetes mellitus, general practitioner as index prescriber, increasing overall number of medications and co-administration of certain cardiovascular co-medications were associated with a lower likelihood for non-persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients identified as high risk for non-persistence require special attention aimed at the improvement of their persistence with statin treatment.

Clinical Management of High and Very High Risk Patients with Hyperlipidaemia in Central and Eastern Europe: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: A retrospective/prospective observational study was conducted to explore the current management of hyperlipidaemia in high-risk (HR) and very high risk (VHR) patients in central/eastern Europe and Israel. METHODS: The study enrolled adult patients who were receiving lipid-lowering therapy and attending a specialist (cardiologist/diabetologist/lipidologist) or internist for a routine visit at 57 sites (including academic/specialist/internal medicine centres) across Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Israel, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Data were collected from medical records, for the 12 months before enrolment, with/without ≤ 6 months' additional prospective follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1244 patients, mean (SD) age 63.3 (11.3) years were included (307 with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), 943 secondary prevention patients). Almost all patients (98.1%) were receiving statins (76.7% monotherapy/21.4% combined therapy), with 53.1% receiving high-intensity statin therapy: 127 patients (10.2%) had adverse events attributed to statin intolerance. Mean (SD) low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were 3.3 (1.7) mmol/L at the first, and 2.7 (1.3) mmol/L at the last, visit of the retrospective phase of observation, with little change during the prospective phase. Less than one-quarter (23.8%; 95% CI 17.29-31.45%) of HR patients and less than half (42.0%; 39.05-44.98%) of VHR patients achieved their risk-based LDL-C targets of < 2.5 and < 1.8 mmol/L, respectively. Less than 15% of FH patients reached these targets (10.9% (5.6-18.7%) of HR and 12.1% (8.0-17.4%) of VHR patients). The revised 2016 ESC/EAS target for HR patients (2.6 mmol/L) was met by 28.5% (21.44-36.38%) of HR patients overall. Almost one-half of patients (42.1%) experienced one or more cardiovascular events during observation. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that, despite widespread statin use, a substantial proportion of patients treated for hyperlipidaemia in central/eastern Europe and Israel, particularly those with FH, do not reach recommended LDL-C targets, thus remaining at risk of cardiovascular events. FUNDING: Amgen (Europe) GmbH.

Treatment pattern of familial hypercholesterolemia in Slovakia: Targets, treatment and obstacles in common practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Maximal doses of potent statins are the cornerstone of treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Despite this, a substantial proportion of FH patients are either under-treated or not treated at all. The aim of this work was to evaluate, in a retrospective study, the treatment of FH patients, the proportion of FH patients reaching low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, and reasons for not reaching LDL-C goals, in 8 lipid clinics in Slovakia dealing with FH patients. METHODS: 201 heterozygous FH patients (50.8 ±â€¯14.9 years, 55% females) who attended the lipid clinics at least three times were included in the study. RESULTS: At the first visit, 31.3% of patients were treated with statins and the most common dose was 20 mg of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin. At the third visit, 78.1% of patients were treated with statins and 24.4% with ezetimibe. The majority of patients were treated with atorvastatin (75.8%) and rosuvastatin (18.5%) and 31.3% of all patients were treated with atorvastatin 80 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg with/without ezetimibe. However, only 11.9% of patients with the LDL-C goal level <2.5 mmol/l and 6.9% with the goal <1.8 mmol/l reached the level. Reasons for not reaching the goal levels were evaluated by physicians in each patient. Insufficient LDL-C lowering effect of treatment, side-effects of therapy and non-compliance of patients were responsible for 46%, 18% and 30% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Referral of FH patients to lipid clinics in Slovakia leads to improvement in the treatment; however, almost 22% of the patients are still without statin treatment and the majority of patients do not reach the LDL-C goal level.

Abnormalities in the relationship of paraoxonase 1 with HDL and apolipoprotein A1 and their possible connection to HDL dysfunctionality in type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Lipid parameters, lipid risk indexes and lipid-related oxidative stress markers (paraoxonase 1 [PON1] and lipid peroxides [LPO]) reflect the actual status of lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We hypothesized that relationships of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) with PON1 and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and/or PON1 with ApoA1 under conditions of hyperglycaemia and oxidative stress might reveal HDL functionality. We investigated relationships between PON1, LPO, and lipid risk markers in T2DM subjects and compared them with those in healthy subjects. METHODS: A total of 107 Caucasian subjects, 67 T2DM outpatients (mean age 52.2 ±â€¯6.9 years) and 40 healthy subjects (mean age 48.1 ±â€¯7.5 years) were included in the study. Serum levels of total cholesterol (CHOL-T), HDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides (TG), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), ApoA1, LPO, and PON1 activity were measured. Non-HDL-c, ApoB/ApoA1 and non-HDL/HDL (lipid risk indexes) were calculated. RESULTS: Higher levels of TG, LPO (P < 0.0001), nonHDL/HDL and ApoB/ApoA1 (P < 0.001, 0.05, respectively), and lower levels of HDL-c, ApoA1, and PON1 (P < 0.0001) were observed in T2DM subjects than in controls. There is a lack of relationship among PON1, HDL-c, and ApoA1 in T2DM patients. PON1 activity positively correlated with these parameters (P < 0.0001) in controls. Strong correlations between non-HDL-c and ApoB (r = 0.956 vs. 0.756; P < 0.0001), LPO and TG (r = 0.831 vs. 0.739; P < 0.0001) were recorded in both study groups (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired anti-oxidant and anti-atherogenic HDL properties associated with weakened PON1 function and lipid peroxidation may contribute to the development of atherosclerosis-related diseases in T2DM.

[Past, present and future of obesity pharmacotherapy]. / Minulost', prítomnost' a budúnost' farmakoterapie obezity.

Obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI > or = 25 and < 30 kg/m2) individuals are at high risk of developing serious chronic health problems, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. Caloric restriction, increased physical activity and behavioral therapy remain the primary treatment options for the management of body weight in these individuals. When a weight loss of 5-10% cannot be achieved in 3-6 months by lifestyle changes drug therapy might be indicated. This review will provide a brief history of obesity pharmacotherapy, discuss the status of currently available obesity drugs and outline the future drug development. A medical need exists for the development of novel weight loss therapies or combinations of known therapies.

Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 in Slovakia: are differences in prevalence of familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 explained by ethnicity?

The objective of this study was to examine frequency of familial defective apo-B-100 (FDB, R3500Q mutation) in probands with the phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and in the general population of 40-year-old subjects in Slovakia and to characterize their lipid and clinical criteria and to compare the frequency of FDB with other populations. We identified 35 patients with FDB among 362 probands with clinical diagnosis of FH and two cases of FDB in the 40-year-old cohort of 2323 subjects from general Slovak population. Probands with FDB differed from those with FH only in plasma triglyceride concentrations (1.84+/-1.4 mmol/l versus 1.45+/-0.98 mmol/l, respectively, p<0.01). Evaluation of personal history of premature atherosclerosis did not show any differences (11.4% in FDB versus 20% in FH, p<0.16). The FDB patients had similar manifestation of xanthomatosis as the FH patients (17.1% versus 8.25%, p<0.25). The frequency of FDB of 9.7% found in the FH patients is among the highest of those reported to date. The frequency of R3500Q mutation of 0.09% found in Slovak 40-year-old subjects did not differ significantly from published population molecular data. Our comparison of estimated FDB frequencies with those which were found by DNA analysis demonstrated that estimated frequencies were not only wider in range, but also significantly higher than those which were assessed by the analysis. The definitive answer to the prevalence of FDB and its biochemical and clinical characteristics requires screening of unbiased samples of the general population from different ethnic groups based on molecular genetic methods.

Lipid levels and their genetic regulation in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100: the MEDPED Slovakia Project.

We examined, from a cohort of 165 families, 529 individuals for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Utilising clinical criteria for diagnosis, we identified 122 patients (n=41 families) as having FH. With PCR testing, 31 individuals (n=12 families) were found to have familial defective Apo B-100 (FDB). From the cohort, 102 normolipidemic (NL) individuals served as a control group. Patients with FH had the highest levels of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (Apo B), followed by FDB patients and the normolipidemic relatives had the lowest levels (P<0.0001 for all parameters). We did not find any effect of Apo E genotypes on lipid levels in the NL or FH group. Therefore, other genetic and/or environmental factors may be responsible for the diversity in the clinical expression in these populations.